Your Score

  /  

Play Again

  / answered

You can choose one answer per question, and your response will automatically take you to the next question. If you’d like to try different answers, you can restart the quiz after all 3 questions have been completed.

2. Você está entrevistando um jornalista palestino sobre o papel da mídia na cobertura de conflitos.

R. “Você pode compartilhar sua experiência cobrindo eventos locais e os desafios que enfrenta como jornalista?”

Você está certo!

Isso permite que o jornalista fale a partir de sua experiência profissional e de sua experiência de vida.

The correct answer is option B.  It diversifies Palestinian contributors by including survivors, organisers, experts and people of diverse social classes and generations, which is important to reflect the full spectrum of society and to create space for both testimony and analysis.

👉Explore more on engaging Palestinians ethically

B. “Você pode explicar a situação política atual e como acha que emergimos dela?”

Não está bem.

Essa pergunta pressupõe que todos os palestinos deveriam ser analistas políticos, em vez de respeitar seus conhecimentos específicos.

C. “Como você lida com questões de segurança e censura ao reportar?”

Você está certo!

Isso permite que o jornalista fale a partir de sua experiência profissional e de sua experiência de vida.

The correct answer is option B.  It diversifies Palestinian contributors by including survivors, organisers, experts and people of diverse social classes and generations, which is important to reflect the full spectrum of society and to create space for both testimony and analysis.

👉Explore more on engaging Palestinians ethically

D. “Que conselho você daria para jovens jornalistas que cobrem tópicos semelhantes?”

Você está certo!

Isso respeita a experiência profissional do jornalista e posiciona sua experiência como valiosa para jornalistas em todo o mundo.

The correct answer is option B.  It diversifies Palestinian contributors by including survivors, organisers, experts and people of diverse social classes and generations, which is important to reflect the full spectrum of society and to create space for both testimony and analysis.

👉Explore more on engaging Palestinians ethically

2. A Palestinian activist has been invited to debate a political figure known for denying Palestinian narratives. What’s the most ethical approach?

A. Proceed with the debate—platforming different views is part of open discussion.

Not quite right.

False neutrality: Not all debates are equal. If one party’s safety is at risk or they are set up to be discredited, this is not a fair discussion.

The correct answer is option C. It balances safety with empowerment and avoids creating harmful or biased platforms.

👉Explore more on engaging Palestinians ethically

B. Inform the activist of the risks but leave the decision entirely up to them.

Not Quite Right

Lack of responsibility: While the activist’s agency matters, organisers have a duty to ensure a safe and ethical platform rather than shifting all responsibility onto them.

The correct answer is option C. It balances safety with empowerment and avoids creating harmful or biased platforms.

👉Explore more on engaging Palestinians ethically

C. Carefully assess potential harm and, if necessary, adjust the format or refuse to host a debate that puts one party at a disadvantage.

You're Right!

Organisers should balance safety with empowerment and avoid creating harmful or biased platforms.

👉Explore more on engaging Palestinians ethically

D. Avoid public debates entirely to prevent risks, even if the activist wants to speak.

Not quite right.

Overprotective Approach: Silencing voices in the name of safety can be counterproductive—ethical engagement should balance protection with empowerment.

The correct answer is option C. It balances safety with empowerment and avoids creating harmful or biased platforms.

👉Explore more on engaging Palestinians ethically

3. A Palestinian human rights advocate is invited to debate a settler leader about a new Israeli settlement expansion in the West Bank. What does it imply?

A. It equates the power and relation of both participants.

You're right!

These debates are flawed as they position the oppressed and the oppressor as equals.

👉Explore more on false parity

B. It allows the audience to hear both perspectives and make their own informed decisions.

Not quite right.

False assumption of neutrality: In reality, these debates often position the oppressed and the oppressor as equal participants, which distorts the existing power dynamic.

The correct answer is option A.

👉Explore more on false parity

C. It ensures that Palestinian voices are not excluded from international discussions.

Not Quite Right

While including Palestinian voices is essential, forcing them into debates with their oppressors does not achieve this in a fair or ethical manner.

The correct answer is option A.

👉Explore more on false parity

D. It provides an opportunity for both parties to find common ground.

Not Quite Right

Framing structural injustice as a "conflict between two sides" misrepresents the situation, and therefore finding common ground is a misguided premise.

The correct answer is option A.

👉Explore more on bothsides-ism

You finished the quiz!
#
correct
#
incorrect
Want to improve your score? Try again or jump to the next quiz.