/  

Você está certo!

Bothsides-ism: The phrase “Israel Gaza” suggests symmetry, implying a “conflict” between equal sides rather than a colonial power committing genocide against an occupied people. It also reinforces colonial narratives that fragment the Palestinian people, as if the violence is limited to Gaza rather than part of a broader colonial system against all Palestinians.
‍👉Explore more here

Passive voice: The headline obscures the perpetrator. There is no mention that it is Israel that bombed and killed.

‍Reductionist language: Terms like “blast” instead of “bombing,” and “loses” instead of “killed,” sanitise the crime. Saying “family members” without clarifying they include his children also dehumanises the story.

‍Erasure: The father is unnamed, despite speaking openly in the article. While anonymity is sometimes necessary for safety, when Palestinians choose to speak publicly, acknowledging their identity is important. We are not numbers. 👉Explore more here

✅ A more ethical headline would be: “Israel kills 11 members of Mr. Khader’s family, including his four children, in one bombing raid on Gaza.”

Not quite right. This is not the core issue here. A, B, D & E are all correct answers. This headline is misleading on these levels:

Bothsides-ism: The phrase “Israel Gaza” suggests symmetry, implying a “conflict” between equal sides rather than a colonial power committing genocide against an occupied people. It also reinforces colonial narratives that fragment the Palestinian people, as if the violence is limited to Gaza rather than part of a broader colonial system against all Palestinians. Explore more here

Passive voice: The headline obscures the perpetrator. There is no mention that it is Israel that bombed and killed.

‍Reductionist language: Terms like “blast” instead of “bombing,” and “loses” instead of “killed,” sanitise the crime. Saying “family members” without clarifying they include his children also dehumanises the story.

‍Erasure: The father is unnamed, despite speaking openly in the article. While anonymity is sometimes necessary for safety, when Palestinians choose to speak publicly, acknowledging their identity is important. We are not numbers. Explore more here

✅ A more ethical headline would be: “Israel kills 11 members of Mr. Khader’s family, including his four children, in one bombing raid on Gaza.”

Not quite right. This is not the core issue here. A & D are correct answers. This headline is misleading on these levels:

Reductionist language: The phrase “leave Jenin” suggests voluntary movement, ignoring the context of forced displacement resulting from Israeli military attacks. Using "raids continue" downplays the severity of the military offensive and normalises Israeli colonial violence.

‍Decontextualisation: Readers are not informed of the ongoing Nakba. The people being ethnically cleansed in this raid are already refugees, denied their right to return for over seven decades.

👉Explore more on euphemisms

✅ A more ethical headline would be: “Israel forcibly displaces hundreds of Palestinian refugees from Jenin amid renewed military assault.”

Not quite right. This is not the core issue here. A & D are correct answers. This headline is misleading on these levels:

Reductionist language: The phrase “leave Jenin” suggests voluntary movement, ignoring the context of forced displacement resulting from Israeli military attacks. Using "raids continue" downplays the severity of the military offensive and normalises Israeli colonial violence.

‍Decontextualisation: Readers are not informed of the ongoing Nakba. The people being ethnically cleansed in this raid are already refugees, denied their right to return for over seven decades.

👉Explore more on euphemisms

✅ A more ethical headline would be: “Israel forcibly displaces hundreds of Palestinian refugees from Jenin amid renewed military assault.”

Not quite right. This is not the core issue here. A & D are correct answers. This headline is misleading on these levels:

Reductionist language: The phrase “leave Jenin” suggests voluntary movement, ignoring the context of forced displacement resulting from Israeli military attacks. Using "raids continue" downplays the severity of the military offensive and normalises Israeli colonial violence.

‍Decontextualisation: Readers are not informed of the ongoing Nakba. The people being ethnically cleansed in this raid are already refugees, denied their right to return for over seven decades.

👉Explore more on euphemisms

✅ A more ethical headline would be: “Israel forcibly displaces hundreds of Palestinian refugees from Jenin amid renewed military assault.”

Not quite right. This is not the core issue here. A & D are correct answers. This headline is misleading on these levels:

Reductionist language: The phrase “leave Jenin” suggests voluntary movement, ignoring the context of forced displacement resulting from Israeli military attacks. Using "raids continue" downplays the severity of the military offensive and normalises Israeli colonial violence.

‍Decontextualisation: Readers are not informed of the ongoing Nakba. The people being ethnically cleansed in this raid are already refugees, denied their right to return for over seven decades.

👉Explore more on euphemisms

✅ A more ethical headline would be: “Israel forcibly displaces hundreds of Palestinian refugees from Jenin amid renewed military assault.”

Not quite right. This is not the core issue here. B, C, D & E are all correct answers. This headline is misleading on these levels:

Discrediting Palestinians: Adding “Hamas-run” before “health ministry” and the word “says” cast doubt on the credibility of the information. 👉 Explore more here

‍Passive voice: More than 40,000 killed obscures the perpetrator, Israel.

‍Decontexualisation and euphemism: Context is obscured by framing it as war instead of a genocide. 👉 Explore more here

✅ A more ethical headline would be: “Israel’s genocide killed more than 40,000 Palestinians in Gaza, Gaza Health Ministry reports”

Not quite right. This is not the core issue here. A, C, E & F are all correct answers. This headline is misleading on these levels:

Decontextualisation: It isolates the event from the broader genocidal context while ignoring that the “operation” involved massacring over 270 Palestinians in the densely populated refugee camp of Nuseirat. Using the word “hostages” also erases the context that they are prisoners.

‍Euphemism: Words like “rescues” and “operation” sanitise systemic violence and reinforce Israeli claims that the genocide is “defensive” rather than offensive and illegal.

‍Passive Voice: “are killed” obscures the perpetrator, Israel.

‍Downplaying: “Scores” obscures the scale of the massacre committed which killed 270 Palestinians.

👉Explore more on euphemisms

✅ A more ethical headline would be: “Israel Kills over 270 Palestinians During Armed Assault on Gaza Refugee Camp to Extract 4 Israeli Prisoners”

Not quite right. This is not the core issue here. A, C, E & F are all correct answers. This headline is misleading on these levels:

Decontextualisation: It isolates the event from the broader genocidal context while ignoring that the “operation” involved massacring over 270 Palestinians in the densely populated refugee camp of Nuseirat. Using the word “hostages” also erases the context that they are prisoners.

‍Euphemism: Words like “rescues” and “operation” sanitise systemic violence and reinforce Israeli claims that the genocide is “defensive” rather than offensive and illegal.

‍Passive Voice: “are killed” obscures the perpetrator, Israel.

‍Downplaying: “Scores” obscures the scale of the massacre committed which killed 270 Palestinians.

👉Explore more on euphemisms

✅ A more ethical headline would be: “Israel Kills over 270 Palestinians During Armed Assault on Gaza Refugee Camp to Extract 4 Israeli Prisoners”